Images for the next edition
Collectors have been giving me feedback for two months about the number of images they would like to see in the next edition. Yes, the second edition just came out. But, if I am going to accommodate collectors wishes, I need to start now.
There is a direct relationship between the number of images in the book and the size of the book. The more images, the bigger the book, and the higher the retail price.
People tell me they want two things:
- Images of all certificates
- Retail cost below $50
I will be able to keep the retail cost within the $50 barrier and still add more images if I:
- Make formatting changes
- Possibly decrease paper weight
My central concern is that the volume is already large, and will only get larger with time.
How about putting images on a CD or DVD?
Many people have suggested I supply images on CDs or DVDs. That seems to be a cost-effective solution.
Depending on resolution. I estimate a single CD could hold around 2,200 full-color, full-size images. A single DVD can hold over six times as many images! By the time the third edition goes to press, it appears most computers will probably contain a DVD reader. Of course, multiple CDs are also a possibility. Even if I decide to publish images on a disk, I still hope to provide 300-500 images in the printed volume (depending on overall size and weight.)
Since I own very few certificates, images must come from other sources. How will I get so many? I beg you, if you have ideas, please tell me.
Credit for images
Many collectors and dealers contributed images for the second edition. Each image carried a “Courtesy of...” caption unless the contributor asked for anonymity.
I plan to continue that practice in both print and disk. On the disk version, I should be able to add links to web sites or e¬mail addresses for dealers. Fortunately, there is such a huge number of certificates to choose from that every dealer who wants to contribute can be represented.
Collectors already own most super-rare certificates, so I emphatically need their support. For security reasons, however, I am deeply concerned about advertising their involvement to the outside world. My policy will be to include collectors’ names only when they specifically ask for inclusion. I want to give credit where credit is due, but I do not want to increase anyone’s risk.
If you own a scanner, and would like to contribute images,
here are the general requirements. (See my web site for many hints on scanning.)
- Scan images in full color.
- Scan at resolutions of 150 to 300 dpi. (Images from electronic cameras are usually not of sufficient quality.)
- Scan images at full scale (no reduction). Do not agonize over getting images straight.
- Turn off auto-exposure. Turn off sharpening.
- Scan full certificates (no edges cut off.) Many certificates are too large for your scanner, so scan in two or more pieces with 1-2” of overlap. Send me the pieces.
- If e-mailing images, send as JPGs. If sending on a disk, images can be JPGs, BMPs, TIFs, or GIFs.
- I would like to include good images of celebrity signatures and imprinted revenues. Please scan at 400-600 dpi.
Several people at R.M. Smythe’s Strasburg show suggested I should probably wait until 2006 to put out the third edition. I am open to alternate viewpoints, so please tell me if you see things differently.
Barring unforeseen circumstances, I plan to ship the 3rd edition in October, 2006. No more shipping at Christmas! If I decide to go the route of including images on a CD, images must be in my hands no later than July, 2006.
Yes, that SEEMS like an extraordinarily long time! But, please believe me, compiling and adjusting 2,000 to 15,000 images will take a huge amount of effort.
Besides, many people will wait until the very last minute and wonder why their contributions did not get in the book.
What if you have already sent high-res images?
Prior to the 2003, I printed high resolution images for my files and then deleted the images from my computer. Since Jan., 2003, I have kept most images. I also keep all CDs.
If you wonder whether I still have images you sent previously, just write and I will send you a print-out of all your images (thumbnail-size in color).
251 New Certificates since December
|Number of certificates listed (counting all variants of issued, specimens, etc.)
|Number of distinct certificates known
|Number of certificates with celebrity autographs
|Number of celebrity autographs known
|Number of railroads and railroad-related companies known
|Number of companies for which at least one certificate is known
|Serial numbers recorded
Facsimile vs hand signatures
Stock and bond expert, Howard Shakespeare, added one further note about signatures (topic in the last newsletter.) He pointed out that hand signatures are ALWAYS on top of other printing. Facsimile signatures are sometimes overprinted with a second color.
The myth of 100% reliable e-mail
As most of you know, I rely heavily on e-mail communications. Unfortunately, e-mail is not as perfect as many people believe.
I am fortunate to have a close relationship with my ISP (internet service provider). We’ve been friends for 20 years. When I learn of a problem with either the web site or with e-mail, it only takes a phone call to research and fix the problem.
One of the things we’ve learned, though, is that not all e-mail is getting through to me. Nor is all my mail getting through to my intended correspondents. The failures are occasional, but troublesome.
Two major dealers (one German, one American) failed to get ads in the second edition because my e-mail notices never reached them. One major dealer in Italy had problems ordering books because his messages did not reach me.
For awhile, I had problems with all e-mail originating from the “wanadoo” network in Europe. In that case, my ISP tracked the problem to an e-mail server on the U.S. East Coast. That operator chose to filter all e-mail from “wanadoo” because the network had once allowed “spamming.”
I bring this up for two reasons. If you depend heavily on e-mail, especially for business, be aware that it is more reliable than ordinary mail, but NOT 100% perfect. Secondly, if you EVER have a problem with me not replying, try calling me, faxing me, or sending a message by ordinary mail. I may not reply the same day, but I work hard to reply within 36 hours. And, if I am out for more than a few days, I set up automatic e-mail replies.
Abbreviating Cox Catalog numbers
I was greatly honored to have had the International Bond and Share Society sponsor two of my small talks at Smythe’s Strasburg show. I don’t do basic research, so I discussed the only thing I actually knew: how I compiled information for the second edition, and what I plan different for the third.
One of the things I discussed was my numbering system. Concern over my catalog numbers actually dates back to 1993 when Fred Schwan (BNR Press) and I first discussed publishing the catalog. Fred thought the catalog number looked cumbersome. I agreed!
But, I pointed out that my numbering system was only one character longer than one used by James Haxby in his monumental 4-volume Standard Catalog of Obsolete United States Bank Notes. (Krause Publications.) Dealers in obsolete paper money routinely list their inventory by Haxby number.
The main difference was that Haxby listed his catalog numbers in abbreviated form. I chose to list the whole catalog number. That was probably a mistake. So, in my talk, I discussed abbreviating catalog numbers.
If you have looked at the online database recently, you probably noticed that catalog numbers are now much shorter. Instead of listing catalog numbers like MIS-716-S-15, I shortened them to S-15.
Full catalog numbers remain the same. Nothing changes for collectors. Sellers, however, could choose to list their certificates like this:
Missouri Kansas & Texas Ry, brown, 1881 (S-15)....... $20
Scanning and sharpening
In the third edition, I will mimic Haxby’s method of combining company codes with company names and thereby shortening numbers. Fortunately, this very simple change will create many pages of extra space.
Collectors continually ask me for pointers on scanning certificates. One of the first things I suggest is to turn off sharpening.
“Sharpening” attempts to make text appear more distinct by enhancing the boundaries between black and white. Unfortunately, the incredibly sharp line work in engraved images confuses scanning software. This is because the spaces between engraved lines are very close together and lines are often very thin.
When scanning software tries to sharpen engraved line work, vignettes often appear “sparkly” and “checkerboarded.” The lower the resolution, the more distinct the effect.
Above is a very high resolution image of part of the vignette shown at the beginning of this issue.
Below left is the same portion of the vignette scanned at 100 pixels per inch and then greatly enlarged. Notice the sharpening problems, most evident in the shadow below the log and the side of the surveyor’s coat.
At right is the same portion scanned at the same resolution with sharpening turned off. Note that the image is rendered as a cleaner grayscale.
|Scanner set to scan with sharpening turned on.
|Scanner set to scan with sharpening turned off.
Let me stress, that the effect of sharpening is most noticeable at low resolutions. The higher the resolution of your scans, the less noticeable the effect of sharpening.