|
I do not and WILL
NOT authenticate autographs.
|
I catalog autographs from key celebrities for this catalog project. Signatures from important celebrities increase values of certificates, sometimes dramatically.
Caution! Sellers often promote signatures as "autographs" but that does not mean they have lasting value. Some "autograph" promotions verge on deception.
Caution! Autographs from obscure people often have value to specialists. Many of those autographs show significant values only when specialists are buying; at other times, those autographs may show negligible values.
Caution! Many sellers promote autographs from Civil War generals as if they are all highly valuable. There were more than 950 full generals in service during war time plus 1,550 more who were awarded brevet general status or posthumous ranks of general during and after the war. It is ludicrous to think autographs from all those 2,500 Civil War "generals" would be valuable. Ascribing values to Civil War autographs should be considered carefully and cautiously.
Caution! As of mid-2010, 2,362 men and women had served as state governors. Many hundreds more served as colonial, territorial and acting governors. Add to that number thousands upon thousands of people who have served as state and federal judges, senators, representatives and mayors. The number of people who have held political office is staggering. Consequently, only a tiny number should be considered sufficiently important for their autographs to be valuable.
Caution! Autograph values shift with time. As public attention shifts with worldwide events, autograph values rise and fall. |
Two classes of "autographs"
This project is intended to catalog collectible certificates from North American railroads. Signatures of famous and important individuals can affect values of those certificates. I list autographs differently, depending on whether I consider them:
- worthy of mention or
- worthy of separate listing and valuation
Autographs that deserve mention
I mention autographs that have attracted attention over time. My criteria for mentioning autographs are:
- Dealers and collectors
recognize signatories as people of fame.
- Autographs from those famous people show moderate collector appeal.
Fame is a hard quality to determine. For their autographs to be collectible and valuable over a long period of time, celebrities must impact history. Be aware that great fame in a short period of time or within one region of the world does not automatically convey enduring fame.
Specialists commonly desire autographs that ordinary collectors know nothing about. When specialists bid against each other, they can cause temporary price spikes for autographs that might no otherwise attract attention. I try to ignore temporary price spikes. I attempt to to determine how much non-specialist collectors will desire autographs in the future. Just because autographs attract high values once does NOT mean they will attract high values the next time.
There are large numbers of now-obscure individuals who were dramatically important to specific regions or specific industries. Some may have been temporary celebrities and may have affected the course of history in somewhat important ways. Perhaps some of those individuals should be more well known than they are. Regardless of their potential historical importance, price records clearly show that autographs from obscure "celebrities" are usually not worth much.
There have been a few cases where books, motion pictures and television programs have altered the public's perceptions of previously obscure individuals. Values of autographs often grow very quickly in response to sudden public attention. Given sufficient time, however, collector interest almost always cycles back toward previous levels. Dealers can most assuredly profit from short-term popularity of obscure autographs. Collectors, however, may be disappointed when they try to liquidate those autographs many years later.
| Over the course of five nights, Ken Burns' 1990 PBS series on the Civil War dramatically increased awareness of forgotten combatants and politicians. Within weeks, prices for autographs from those re-discovered celebrities rose sharply. Today, most of those price spikes have disappeared and the values of Civil War autographs have dropped back toward more sustainable levels. |
Try to be aware of the long-term popularity of specific autographs. Do not let any seller convince you to overpay for obscure autographs. Beware of artificial hype. Sellers can make obscure individuals sound terribly interesting and important when, in fact, many have minimal claim to fame.
Autographs that deserve separate listings and price estimates
In late 2009, I thoroughly re-examined all the autographs listed in my database. I found it impossible to justify estimating values for all obscure autographs.
Collectors generally believe that autographs should enhance the values of certificates on which they appear. Some autographs enhance values very substantially, but autographs are not created equal.
In truth, many so-called autographs have no noticeable effect on certificate. Experienced collectors already understand this fact. I am greatly more concerned with inexperienced collectors.
My unyielding policy is to avoid implying false or fleeting values to inexperienced collectors.
I use a hard and fast valuation rule. I list and value autographs only when they clearly and justifiably add to certificate values.
I list celebrity autographs only when they routinely
increase certificate values at least $25 |
AND |
increase certificate values at least 25%. |
|
Below these thresholds, I do not think it is possible to determine whether autographs contribute to certificate values.
Collectible certificates display an inescapable price reality. Actual prices paid for nearly identical non-autographed certificates are exceedingly variable. If I estimate values for a particular variety at $100, it is common to see prices range from $40 to $225 within a year or two. Certificates that appear less frequently show even more severe price fluctuations.
With large price ranges as the backdrop, I pose two questions:
- Why estimate values of so-called autographed certificates if we cannot detect the values of autographs separate from the certificates on which they appear?
- Why run the risk of deluding less experienced collectors by estimating values for autographs from minor and obscure celebrities?
Let's examine the ramifications of estimating autograph values when prices are so highly variable
Let's say an ordinary certificate generally sells for $5 to $10. If a celebrity autograph routinely increases the values of those certificates to $30 to $40, that autograph probably deserves a separate listing.
Autographs that appear on more expensive certificates are more troublesome. Let's imagine that a scarcer variety of non-autographed certificate sold in the U.S. for $225 to $275 during the last two years. I would probably estimate the value of that certificate at $250. Now imagine that an autographed example of that certificate sold for $325 in a German auction. Does that autograph deserve listing?
Not necessarily. American railroad certificates typically sell for 25% or 30% more in Germany than they do in the U.S. Therefore, we would expect certificates that sell for $250 in the U.S. to sell for about $325 in Germany. From that perspective, the celebrity autograph probably added no additional value.
On the other hand, if previous sales had taken place in Europe (instead of the U.S.) at $225 to $275, then we have a different story. In that situation, the autograph had a clear impact on price. The autograph clearly raised prices from about $250 to $325 and therefore fetched a $75 premium.
List of autographs
See my special list of ALL KNOWN AUTOGRAPHS elsewhere on this web site. Autographs listed on that page are those that collectors and dealers, at one time or another, felt worthy of enhanced values. Be warned that:
| Not all those autographs are worthy of enhanced values today. |
| |
| Not all those autographs will appreciate in value over time. |
|
Sellers often promote autographs of individuals of little or no celebrity. I will NOT list those kinds of unimportant autographs.
I understand that reasonable people will disagree
with my choices of listed autographs. Some may even think it is okay to delude beginners. I don't. I do NOT want to mislead collectors into thinking all autographs have value.
If ever in doubt about valuation or inclusion, please remember:
| Not everyone who signed certificates was a celebrity. |
| Not all celebrity signatures are valuable. |
| Not everyone with a famous last name was a celebrity. |
| Just because people ran large companies does NOT make their signatures valuable. |
| Autographs are valuable only when many collectors agree. |
| Autographs that show increased value at one point in time do not necessarily stay valuable. |
| Very few military or political figures achieved sufficient fame for their signatures to be enduringly valuable. |
Autograph collecting is usually about the money.
Signatures from major personalities – Commodore Vanderbilt, Rockefeller, Carnegie – are expensive and have been for years. The values of Morgan, Harriman and Gould are still moderately pricey, but have lost value in the last decade.
Signatures
from minor and local celebrities have limited values outside of small
numbers of specialists. Signatures from individual company presidents may
be important to collectors of single lines, but price records prove that few other collectors seem
to care.
Third, fourth- and fifth-generation Vanderbilts may have been
valorous individuals, but their signatures often have limited value. A famous last name does confer automatic value to autographs.
Yes, there are specialists who collect locally famous military figures, politicians, U.S. Senators, presidential
cabinet members, university founders, philanthropists, brokers and speculators. Regardless of rarity, long-term price records clearly indicate extreme specialties attract limited interest. When interest is narrow, prices are low. Highly specialized autographs often experience short-lived price spikes.
Again, my philosophy is simple – – –
|
Not all so-called "autographs" are valuable
|
What if you don't know whether an autograph comes from a genuine celebrity? Information about true celebrities should be easy to find. Descriptions of genuine celebrities always appear in:
- major biographies
- major biographical dictionaries
- major
encyclopedic sources
Millions of online sources are
acceptable sources for information, but the same rules should apply. Scattered appearances
on a few web pages does not make someone a celebrity.
References should be numerous and diverse.
There is a simple test for celebrity:
- If
it is hard to find information about people who signed certificates, then
those people were not major personalities. Don't let anyone tell you they were.
Take Henry Oppenheimer, for instance. His signature is
found on hundreds, perhaps thousands, of B&O certificates from around 1900.
He had a famous last name. He obviously controlled significant wealth. However, I challenge anyone to discover who that man was. (See my December, 2004 newsletter for more discussion of Oppenheimer.)
| Update from Jan 4, 2010. Collector Mark Feldman found reference to a Henry Oppenheimer and Co. in Baltimore. Feldman suggests Henry Oppenheimer may have been a partner in Hutzler Brothers Co. Morton Hutzler was a Baltimore department store owner who held a seat on the NYSE. Salomon Brothers bought Hutzler's seat in 1910 by merging that business into Salomon Brothers & Hutzler. There are also genealogical references to a Henry Oppenheimer of New York City, but so far, no one has contributed a definite connection to the man who owned the many B&O certificates. |
Appearances in a few sales does not make autographs valuable
Major autographs
will sell
in multiple major auctions and they will appear in many different dealers' price
lists.
There are crucial ideas to consider:
- Just because auction catalogs list
certificates with "autographs" does not mean those autographs are truly
valuable.
- A large percentage of autographed certificates go unsold.
- Just because eBay sellers chatter about "rare" signatures
does not make those autographs either rare or valuable. Beware of eBay seller hype.
- Signatures that sell for high prices
one time may not necessarily sell for high prices later. Important autographs show widespread appeal and their appeal
will be long-term and repetitive.
Two warnings for beginning and intermediate autograph collectors.
NEVER collect
autographs unless you know precisely why YOU must own them. Who cares whether sellers list specific names as "autographs"? Mentioning names does NOT make autographs valuable. It does not mean that autographs will become valuable in the future. Why would you
spend money on autographs if you don't genuinely want
them for your collection?
I recognize that specialists
collect autographs from hundreds of individuals who do not
appear in my list. Some autographs
have significant local values. Please understand that autographs of locally-important individuals usually have limited value elsewhere.
What about certificates issued to celebrities,
but not signed by them? Some people collect famous names on certificates, even
though the celebrities did not sign them.

There is definitely some demand for those kinds of curiosities. I DO list a few "issued to" certificates when they meet the same valuation requirements as autographs: they must sell for at least $25 more than ordinary certificates and they must increase certificate values by at least 25%.
I beg you in the strongest possible way. Please buy autographs and autograph-related certificates cautiously.
Send an email message with corrections, questions or comments about this page.
(Last updated Feb 24, 2011) |
|